Read Time:1 Minute, 48 Second



Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: [email protected]

Sponsorship inquiries: [email protected]

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp7OZvD3Hv4

City Watcher’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@user-wy7tw6yv9n

Articles-
http://bit.ly/3DgVxm9
https://bit.ly/3JgudIr
http://bit.ly/3HxeinO

Sources:

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.020- http://bit.ly/3j2OOp1

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.021- http://bit.ly/3CkAkYT

State v. Burks- http://bit.ly/3XYJjGM

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.010- https://bit.ly/3KfLakH

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 577.001- https://bit.ly/3weN2UT

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 544.218- http://bit.ly/3H5DX5D

Green v. Director of Revenue- http://bit.ly/3iZB9Pz

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.266- http://bit.ly/3j5IBbO

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.271- http://bit.ly/3JceUjR

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 542.276- http://bit.ly/3JofXNE

Mo. R. Crim. P. 26.02- https://bit.ly/3XV5ZYn

Zurcher v. Stanford Daily- http://bit.ly/3j35YTr

source

Audit the Audit

About Post Author

Audit the Audit

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

29 thoughts on “Mayor FORCES Cops To Leave His Property

  1. Huh? How is it ok for a mayor to bully an officer for doing his job correctly? This one is confusing.

    And he looked really panicked when the subject of seeing the cameras came up, maybe they're videoing things that they shouldn't be in the store? It really reminded me of a scene in a movie where the mayor turns out to be the drug lord or something.

  2. Lmfao…
    Let me remind ATA:
    MY TAX DOLLARS PAY FOR POLICE… THE TAX DOLLARS THAT ARE STOLEN AND USED BY THE GREEDY GOVERNMENT AND THEY GUARANTEED MY MONEY WILL BE WELL SPENT… WITH THAT BEING SAID, THOSE TAX DOLLARS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED ARE USED FOR POLICE TO DO THEIR JOB WITHOUT THE ASSISTANCE FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES THAT ARE NOT PAID BY EXTORTION DOLLARS…. NO ONE OWES THE POLICE ASSISTANCE OR RESPECT…. THEY WORK FOR THE PEOPLE, THEY ARE SERVANTS, THEY MAY REQUEST ASSISTANCE BUT SHALL NOT RECEIVE ASSISTANCE IF THE PERSON THEY ARE REQUESTING IS NOT WILLING TO ASSIST….
    All being said: your assertion that someone that wasn't willing to assist is in any way a bad person is completely and ultimately disgusting…. I know you don't care, I know the only thing you care about is receiving engagement of your content but you continue to attack those that have no duty or are not required when you don't understand an individual in their current capacity or previous engagements they've had has become more and more blatant as your content comes out. Let's be real for a minute and say your content is starting to become bias as our MSM media today and continues to lean into a very bad pattern. Just wanted to remind you that one of your demographics has noticed and will voice their opinions as you voice yours. Have a good day, and may America work to put government in it's place where the people own the government and not the other way around…

  3. Not true on the cops being there. I've walked into businesses and seen a bunch of cops there hanging out and turned around and left. simply purchasing alcohol in front of cops can trigger them to pull you over later if they are not acting in accordancecof the law. Yes, cops aren't all bad people, but there are too many that act outside the law and bend it all too often that even a legal incident can later at another time be turned into suspicious with a cop on another date. It's like when I had neighbors that would have the police respond to the duplex I lived in almost daily. The local cops started stopping me because the recognized me. Sure, I lived next door. I've met cops that deal drugs. I've know cops that beat the hell out of suspects without cause, but cleared by IA. I know cops that break every traffic law going home. Etc. And I know cops that are just trying to serve the people in the city they live. Good job for the cop in this video. I wish more cops acted like that all the time. He might be one of the good ones.

  4. That poor lady working in that liquor store has to deal with having an enraged lunatic for a boss. Shit, even the drunk thought that the guy was acting crazy! That's when you know you're dealing with a lunatic when the drunk who you're arresting is on your side!

  5. Blatant corruption from the top down. Classic case of dereliction of duty. Cop had an obligation to arrest this drunk and jail him for being under the influence twice in less than 48 hours. The commentator was way too lenient in his critique of all parties.

  6. Good on Mr. Foster for telling that cop to fuck of. He's right in saying that the police presence drives away customers, especially in todays day and age, with growing distrust with law enforcement. I know that if i'm going to buy liquor i avoid any store thats obviously being stalked/swarmed by police, becsuse even if i'm abiding by the law, the police still lie and/or escalate

  7. Buddy tried to threaten him by saying imma call the chief 😂😂😂 nice try pig, that’s one walk of shame if I have ever seen one, good job mayor walker

  8. Mayor walker got an A+ imo.. because ultimately the the seller of the alcohol beverage should determine if the customer was to intoxicated and should of refused service clerk gets an c- cop should of investigated their suspect as he leaves the parking lot an get him for DUI..

  9. I'll never condone drunk driving. You should receive help and lose your license if you do. But if the police violate your rights you have no rights. The rules matter.

  10. I have absolute zero sympathy for drunk driving. I actually think the laws and punishments should be far harsher. Absolutely no reason it should be tolerated.

  11. That dude was clearly expecting to drive out of there and was surprised when he said I guess I’ll have to walk home. That officer should’ve arrested him based on the call and his intoxication alone. I would’ve stood back and let the guy get in the car and pull him over as soon as he backs out. And the store owner needs some good old fashion wild West justice upside his head

  12. Oh please. Cop should have told the guy he better not drive and then leave. Instead he wanted that arrest. Those business owners get an A+. That cashier is shady and needs to go.

  13. I see a lot of people bitching about the guy not letting them have the video footage, but that is kind of countered by the cop cutting him losse after the fact because they could have arrested him without that video evidence. If the cop doesn't have legal rights to the footage it is perfectly reasonable to deny him access to it. I get not wanting people drinking a driving, but them seeing or not seeing that footage will have virtually no bearing on that and it is well within reason to not allow police to review footage from your private cameras. They are yours, you are in your rights to say, "Not without a warrent." If them requesting it is within reason they will get the warrent, if not, they didn't need it.

  14. I actually believe this is the way all citizens should treat police if more people stood their ground against tyranny these police wouldn’t be so apt to trample another’s rights when their egos get hurt

  15. I feel bad for that girl who said she didn't call but also hope the cop understood why she said that once the shit mayor backed up the drunk.

Comments are closed.

1697715899 Maxresdefault.jpg Previous post We Put Future Tires on our Miata
1697717517 Maxresdefault.jpg Next post Every Country On Earth Fights For $250,000!