Are Undercanopy Lights Worth It?

13 thoughts on “Are Undercanopy Lights Worth It?”

1. u ran all red lights under canopy ?

2. Everyone commenting UC is a game changer lol. UC has been done for decades. It's the lighting technology that is available these days that makes UC a game changer now. The concept was always solid. Glad to see the tech available to make it feasable. Will definitly be trying to break my record with some. Cut the check!

3. Gotta learn as ya go! Love it!

4. Ok

5. With UC lighting the DLI would change or stay the same? As in should you try to shoot far above the 65 threshold and maybe double it like 130 DLI?

6. With under canopy, side lighting, etc the industry will transform into grams/sqft instead of pounds per light eventually. We are adding a ton of light, not just 1 overhead anymore! For our company we assess grams per watt as well. UC is a game changer for yield but if it isn't done right quality will diminish

7. Just to add balance. I have a dedicated mono crop room. One bench with think grow icl 300, one with craft farmer v3 and one with faven r8. Personally I think the faven line is out performing but need to run them all for a good year or so to really compare. But ultimately, if you go with any of the big names in under canopy you’ll get a good return. Fan boys will always be fan boys, let the evidence speak – test for yourself.

   As an old mix horizontal and vertical HPs grower, these under canopy lights were a no brainer for me. Even have a row with some side lights also going in next run

8. What is meant by “Runoff volume is based on substrate EC ranges. 4-5 EC by flip” figured this might be a good place to ask😂

9. “I’d rather smoke you bottoms” chill out white diddy

10. spoken like a guy who never saw vert lighting lol

11. 😂 The Big
    Buds

12. IMHO I think you're just selling lights

13. gotta light?

Comments are closed.