Read Time:1 Minute, 38 Second



Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: [email protected]

Sponsorship inquiries: [email protected]

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnb4HjunRsg&t=0s

Last American Patriot’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCM20Er1MYVWK0VLcYiO6uFg

Sources:

Florida v. Royer- https://bit.ly/2N09XjA

U.S. v. Valadez- https://bit.ly/3OhXCkJ

Rodriguez v. United States- https://bit.ly/2LS1sqc

State v. Smith- https://bit.ly/3xyhskU

Anderton v. State- https://bit.ly/3b4BcFp

Simpson v. State- https://bit.ly/3tD5B49

Emerson v. State- https://bit.ly/3mS34PK

United States v. Sowards- https://bit.ly/3mO0B91

Tex. Transp. Code § 521.025- https://bit.ly/3Odqr1K

Delaware v. Prouse- https://bit.ly/3iz7lV3

Brown v. Texas- https://bit.ly/3p1SKDr

source

Audit the Audit

About Post Author

Audit the Audit

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

33 thoughts on “Guy Catches Cops Lying And Forces Them To Leave

  1. It is such bs that an officer's "visual estimate of speed" can be the basis of "reasonable suspiction" to initiate a traffic stop. If a police officer is stopped, any speed that a vehicle is going would look fast to them weather it was 25 or 60. I have been followed many times from my gf's house by police, even though I was going the speed limit, used my turn signals when approprate, and otherwise followed every rule of the road. It seems that an officer's "visual estimate of speed" would give them the power to pull over cars whenever they want to. Without a speed gun, there is no way an officer, or anyone for that matter, could elsimate the speed of a car going down the road.

  2. I was born in Texas lucky to get out, however this man is obviously a WHITE Texan & there so the stop and ID law that absolutely does exist does apply to this man that I am 99% sure advocated for this law in the first place. I always agree with your grading however there is literal ID check points randomly for no reason all over Texas to catch illegal immigrants.

    I have internet. See
    Texas law only requires that you show your ID to a police officer under certain circumstances. These circumstances include: after you've been arrested, when you are driving, and when you are carrying a handgun.

  3. And here’s what I think happened, this cop was just looking to write some tickets, or maybe his supervisor told him that he needed to start grading more in fractions and doing a better job. So this cop was on the lookout and targeted this guy. Assuming it would be someone who doesn’t know the law or wouldn’t question what he said, and he would get an easy. Ticket however he got the wrong guy. And instead of just walking away, he made it worst.

  4. It's too bad that only supervisors can be called when there is a dispute between a citizen and a police officer, their bias is usually already built in. Usually supervisors agree with their officer's conduct, double down on their errors being correct and sometimes make things worse. Rarely are supervisors openminded, logical and fair, but when they are – it's a beautiful thing to behold.

  5. Im not standing up for the cop cuz i don't kno the entire situation but the narrator tries to make the cop sound absurd by quoting the cop said the driver was goin 10% over the speed limit which equals out to 2.5 and the human eye obviously cant judge the speed that precisely, but what the cop says is he was going over 10% over the speed limit which is a much more reasonable statement, basically he said dude was going at least 3mph over the limit and a properly trained officer should be able to judge that, and are we just suppose to take dude on his word that he was goin 16 i mean what incentive does he have to lie right? I mean if u just assume hes tellin the truth cuz people "never lie" to avoid legal punishment then why shouldn't we just take oj simpsons sworn statement in court that he didn't kill his wife and friend.

  6. Wow, so the sargeant's argument was that police have the right to pull any driver over at any time just to see their driver's license LMAO. What in the actual fuck!

  7. The first officer probably wasn’t a bad guy. However, it seems that there may be incentive to issue citations, along with the possibility of poor training, that seem to guide many officers in this type of “fishing” in search of any infraction.

Comments are closed.

1676424463 Maxresdefault.jpg Previous post We Test $300 vs $300,000 3D Printer
1676428474 Maxresdefault.jpg Next post I Cleaned The World’s Dirtiest Beach #TeamSeas