Read Time:21 Second



Slipknot frontman Corey Taylor opens up about the financials of the band. The Slipknot lead singer says that the band members don’t make a lot of money considering the number of members and their expenses.

I’d appreciate it if you took a moment to follow 🙂
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/rockfeednet
X: (formerly Twitter) https://twitter.com/RockFeedNet
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rockfeedofficial
Website: https://www.rockfeed.net

source

Rock Feed

About Post Author

Rock Feed

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

21 thoughts on “Corey Taylor on How Much Money Slipknot Really Makes

  1. That's crazy yet you see pop stars and rappers spend crazy amounts of money at clubs, restaurants putting up party's and when they don't tour or make another successful album it goes away like that. So when I hear bands that struggle and say I made enough just to buy a home for my family I give them credit

  2. One thing to think about is as a partner of a band like slipknot you earn great money, but you are also required to reinvest that money back into things like recording, production and tours.
    lets have a guess, that the partners might make 15m a year each, but might have to put 12m back into the business to pay for all the greater band expenses.
    My back of the envelope guess is the partners make 3m a year profit, and those in the band who don't have partner status, probably make about 1m

  3. Most bands have 4 to 6 members.
    And people don't buy albums anymore Tickets and merchandise are extremely expensive. To make up the loss. Streaming doeant pay shit. And Slipknot is not in my top 20 favorite bands.

  4. Just because they made money doesn’t mean they knew how to keep it or didn’t blow it, and there are 9 of them. And they had a SHITTY deal with Roadrunner too.
    Nobody looks at the economics, they look at big band = rich members.

    Continuous digital streams is better than one time physical albums purchases.
    There’s no physical cost for manufacturing or debt to huge labels for investment. Especially depending on what percentage of each dollar they made from sales after all that. They’d make more money now.
    And who’s to say their sales numbers are even that good anymore comparatively.

  5. I feel like when you look at "Upper Middle Class" levels of money, then yeah corey makes alot cpmpared to some other people, I think the big difference though is wealth maintenence. How much you have vs how much you have to put out to maintain it. Do they have to keep touring to maintain their financial freedom, more than likely yes. Corey and the other members probably make a little more then what your average upper corporate c8 corvette grandad makes, but even those people had to work till their 70's to have enough money to maintain that lifestyle. So are they loaded? As long as they tour enough to save enough to maintain that lifestyle yes. But are they upper echelon pop star rich where they could breakup right now and stop touring completely and still be able to live the way they do without changing their way of life at all. No, I dont think so.

  6. Slipknot is doing just fine there's a lot of other artists in worst positions that are still trying to put on a massive presences in the shows for audience captivation I love slipknot but come guys there doing just fine not Taylor Swift fine by any means but there be good for the rest of there lives pretty much

  7. How TF is metallica valued at one BILLION usd and these guys are making upper middle class money??? WHAT? I love metallica but the gap between these bands financially should not be so great. The world is an effed up place if these guys aren't loaded by now. Sad.

Comments are closed.

1710790555 Hqdefault.jpg Previous post Things That’ll Make You Feel Old! – 80s Edition – Part 1
1710797465 Maxresdefault.jpg Next post Criminal History of Kodak Black