NASA Apollo Astronaut Finally Faces Off Against #1 Moon Landing Skeptic

38 thoughts on “NASA Apollo Astronaut Finally Faces Off Against #1 Moon Landing Skeptic”

1. Huge shout out to our Patreon subscribers! Get every episode early & ad-free: https://patreon.com/dannyjones
   Thank you to our sponsors who help make this show happen:
   https://mengotomars.com – Use code DANNY to get 60% off for life & 3 free gifts.
   https://zippixtoothpicks.com – Use code DANNY to get 10% off your first order.
   https://whiterabbitenergy.com/?ref=DJP – Use code DJP for 20% off.

2. Scuba diving is different cause the tubes are under pressure so at different depths your air lasts different amounts of times.. also there are re breathers…

3. Bart was a Nashville taxicab driver in 2009, Charlie was an astronaut…..

4. Shibrel makes me shick. 🤢🤮

5. If they didn't land on the moon, you'd think that Russia would have had something to say about it. 😉

6. He doesnt understand how top secret clearances work.. you cant tell people information thats deemed top secret. If it isnt deemed top secret, you can tell anyone unclassified stuff… what a goofball!!!

7. that guy bart is missing all his top teeth. his sources right off the bat arent credible, and when he tries to justify the clips its absolutely wild. I tried taking barts side and he is so aggressive towards the General I can't follow what hes saying. BUT the General is totally lost in this conversation and his side isn't credible either. WHAT ARE WE ACCOMPLISHING with this argument???

8. 3 hours and bro proved literally nothing. Every single piece of his “evidence” could easily be written off as either hear say or just faked. He has nothing of definitive proof. And not sure why we thinks the astronauts would be able to answer all those bullshit logistical questions that have nothing to do with what they do. If this is the best the moon conspiracy theorist have then it’s over for you guys 😂

9. Shame on you for treating an elderly, distinguished man, Charles Duke, so badly. The host and the baldy git are assholes.

10. Boy, I wish Neil Gegrasse Tyson could have joined this conversation to get these guys straightened out on the physics! I'm sure Braun was referring to a single stage rocket not being able to carry enough fuel to get to the moon. That problem was solved by going to a three stage design.

11. Suffering Succotash

12. I don't know who this Danny is but it seems every snot nosed kid who can say' oncological' has a podcast now.
    The astronaut may have been hypnotised. His inability to do anything but repeat that it was exciting and I wanted to stay longer, seems dubious.
    But Danny just seems oblivious, crossing his eyes at shadows & pretending he's an authority on the shape of a rock on the moon, is just ridiculous.
    You've got two airheads demanding the reasoned skeptic disprove their lie… Pitiful.

13. This astronaut is recounting his life’s experiences. With in depth facts . The other guy Bart just has a lifetime of studying the moon landing and came to his own conclusions about America never landed on the moon . Has his opinion on this subject really even mattered ? Why don’t he spend the rest of his life learning about how the government is lying now about everything and all the corruption and figuring out what it all means And then coming out with a detailed explanation that some one might be interested in listening to ? Maybe he wasted a lot of his time . Listening to this for 3 hours is a waste of time

14. Seem to read about an independent inquiry, the man was about to deliver his findings to a committee when he was "killed" in a car "accident"……and here is the strange fact. The report was not found at the scene of the tragedy, nor at his office or home……….and the interim findings suggested the moon landings was not possible with the current technology used in the late '60s.

15. Russia never landed an astronaut on the moon

16. Is Bart a scientist, a pilot or ever worked for NASA? If not why would his mis informed opinions get so much attention from the host of this channel?

17. Like his cartoon name Bart who was brought up by Homer is a compleate idiot .
    Bart how do you explain traks and spacecraft debris on the moon.
    I bet Bart also belives the earth is Flat .
    The sun gos round the earth theres a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow.
    Bart keep taking the happy tabs idiot wasteing your life away on NOTJING BART NOTHING.
    Oh that first question is such a dumb ass question fool

18. Idk I’m leaning towards pops on this one , the other guy just has internet sources .

19. All I can say to help this man is don’t believe everything you hear on the internet

20. The objective was to make billions of dollars to build technical rockets and equipment to go to the moon and make everyone rich instead of building war equipment, and start wars to make everyone rich. Actually a good idea.

21. Bart you can eat my shorts!!!

    I would like when we go back to the moon, they land near Neil and Buzz’s place and after a few kind words to team Apollo and Yuri Gagari the Astronaught points at the remains of the Eagle and says Bart Sibel you’re a confirmed NOBODY, and a piece of crap.

22. Bart is like a spoiled lil brat that is jealous of the other kids on the playground cuz they didnt pick him for kick ball. 😂 wen asked for specific undeniable facts he just starts rambling on about nazis and random stuff that has nothing to do with the subject. Wen someone results to insults and finger pointing its clear that the have lost the debate😂😂

23. I guess no one else was available to defend to Apollo program, so they sent Captain Dementia.

24. 2:46:41…. Wait. Where am I?

25. Charlie Duke is a US hero a 90 year old astronaut that risked his life for his country. Why would you let his character be attacked like that. Bart just proved what a dirt bag he is which makes everything he says very suspect. I can can tell Charlie Duke is of great moral integrity and you need to apologize to him and ask his forgiveness for allowing him to be attacked like that on your show

26. A idiot vs an astronaut … one of them makes a living spewing bullshit .

27. Sibrel is an idiot

28. This debate showed two things. 1. How pathetic moon deniers are with zero credible evidence. And 2. How credible Charlie Duke is to show up and frankly waste 4 hrs of his valuable time with this nut job.

29. How many pounds of moon rocks did he pick up? I missed that part😂

30. Von Braun was saying it wasn’t possible in a single stage rocket. It was possible in the three stage rocket. They ended up developing. This guy uses everything out of context.

31. This guy is just being a douche bag. He’s also wrong about a lot. I’m sure we did not go to the moon, but his proof is quite suspicious. One fact that he’s completely wrong about is saying that today’s rockets carry twice as much fuel, when in fact, the largest SpaceX rocket today carries less fuel than the Saturn five.

32. This dude just came to attack the others character. That's how you know he doesn't have a good argument. Bro cited wikipedia…😂

33. The funding dried up for NASA after the moon race, thats why the technology never advanced, simple. And we do have the tech, but we are carrying Way Larger Payloads now!

34. This Bart guy is a complete idiot. How embarrassing.

35. "we landed on the moon" dumb & dumber

36. This Bart guy is a total idiot.

37. The Danny Jones podcast is the absolute worst podcast of all time

38. I was actually open to hearing Barts arguments but so far in the video hes starting off with ad hominem attacks, asking why are you here etc., He really is showing an aggresive attitude like thats actually hurting your argument man, and I would pose the same question back to Bart, if he had overwhelming evidence the moon landings were fake and hes well known for disproving moon landings so much then why Is Bart there? The sheer stupidity of him starting off like that already turned me off, but I will try and press on to see if he has any objective evidence based on critical thinking and logic and not just some guy said such and such. Bart my guy if you want to make a strong argument you need to learn humility and to present your evidence clearly and concisely, not coming on strong with some sort of bravado like you are just there to win the argument, if your side of the argument is true then you should be more calm and collected. I commented this at 51:44 in the video.lets see if his arguments get any better then logical fallacies etc.

Comments are closed.