Navy Admiral Warns Unknown Objects are HUNTING Our Nuclear Submarines | Tim Gallaudet

33 thoughts on “Navy Admiral Warns Unknown Objects are HUNTING Our Nuclear Submarines | Tim Gallaudet”

1. Watch every episode ad-free & uncensored on Patreon: https://patreon.com/dannyjones
   Support the show & check out our sponsors:
   https://cornbreadhemp.com/danny – Use coed DANNY for 30% off your first order.
   https://morning.ver.so/danny – Use code DANNY to save 15% on your first order.
   https://whiterabbitenergy.com/?ref=DJP – Use code DJP for 20% off

2. "I have that book sittibg on my nightstand " lol no you don't. Lol ive heard you claim same thing about other books. Gtfo

3. Why do we need nuclear submarines?

4. Ancient historians view Plato's story of Atlantis as fiction, and I think they are right.

5. @dannyjones Catalina Island UAP's deserve an entire episode.

6. Why is there no serious discussion regarding magnetic levitation?

   So many other issues not addressed, but I'll drop this to start with.

7. 26:30 sounds like this scenario could have been a level in the hit man game series..

8. Nice guy, bur do I believe him? No. The UFO thing is a way to get money from the DOD to CIA. You may know that CIA have no budget and get money from DOD. so the more money the DOD get, the more CIA get. And UFO is the perfect scam. A program that can NOT produce any results by LAW which finances can be funneled into any dark op the CIA need. It is perfect.

9. This was a top five DJ show for me.

10. This Admiral is cool

11. You two are very intuitive and obviously well informed; however, like almost all enlightening discussions, you have started with a totally incorrect perception:
    U Objects of all sorts are here to monitor our homicidal heritage, especially now that we have MAD Nuclear Idolatry running our entire existence and planet. Nuclear devices of all sorts not only are generally very unstable and dangerous but incredibly easy to track, likely even from far distant solar systems. So, intelligence likely has come here to prevent us from creating our own total annihilation. Likely again not particularly to save humanity but to save the value of Earth as a Green Goddess in the Cosmos.
    Whoever they are I'm sure they look at us an errant problem child.

12. The conclusion seems to be inescapable: For the side that believes these to be real: whoever is piloting these things is engaging in en masse passive show of force. Whatever and whoever they are – they want us to know that they're watching us, that there is nothing we could do to get rid of them, and that they're here to stay. As far as their continued presence near Russian and American strategic subs, – what other message would it be except: "nuclear war isn't something we plan to permit"? The intelligence behind these objects is, although non-verbally, yet very succinctly communicating to humans in charge that it is a force to be reckoned with, and what its intentions are. It wants the people in charge to believe that it's restrained and benign. However, intelligence is also morally neutral, and this is the intelligence that exceeds ours in roughly the same ratio as human intelligence exceeds that of cattle. Which is why I have to ask: how well do we treat our cattle? We may not want our cattle to be terrified for reasons entirely other than concern about its welfare.

    And conversely – for the side that is in denial of UAPs, or doesn't believe they exist – well, in their case what is the takeaway message? I suppose the message here would seem to be that certain people in charge desperately, subconsciously wish some external higher intelligence rescued us all from our human self-destructive predicament? And that this subconscious drive is so strong that it predisposes some very intelligent people to completely forego their training and life experience, and label completely normal human or natural objects "UAPs, feeding into alien/UFO lore, and risking their careers and reputations in the process? There are only 2 sides to this coin, or it may be a coin with just one side.

13. Significant dives off of La Jolla and Scripps trench. Admirals scare me. Take my chances with a bull shark rather than a flag officer. China Lake also known as R-2505 NID, Navy In Desert. The lab is another special place. Great interview, thank you both.

14. Sounds like a good news. Reptilian proxies neutralized, good. More the marrier.

15. If the Moon Landing was fake then the Jodrell Bank Radio Telescope staff in the UK lied, Sir Patrick Moore, the famous UK astronomer who was involved in reporting the Appollo mission lied, that I do not believe, and the Russians and Chinese would have broadcast the fact to the World at the top of their voices.

16. This man has a PhD in oceanography, let him talk in his own words! Danny keeps pushing him to talk about navy seals. The man had to back up 4 times to get back on topic.

17. Something about Mr. Tim reminds me of Paul Harvey. Paul Harvey was the best…broadcaster and human being. RIP Mr. Harvey.

18. If Danny is not a good looking white guy — he would be a nobody. He is so dumb, he is painful to listen to. Here for the Admiral.

19. Well all these whistleblowers are either ready for retirement or retired knowing what they know their wages were the priority not the secrecy.

20. This guy IS the unidentified object

21. Admiral Gallaudet is the non-insufferable version of James Cameron telling ocean anecdotes.

22. Hi Danny, if you wanted to have Tim back and just discuss the oceans, I'd be down for that–you have my vote! Thanks! 🐟🐬🌊

23. I swear Danny and Urijah Faber are related.

24. Cut the 15 minute adverts. It was hard to watch your shit for 15 minutes anyway, without having to watch 15 minutes in-between shit

25. The lack of knowledge on many of the subjects as well as complete misinformation spread throughout was shocking and became unlistenable.

26. I'm sure I'll take some heat for this, but it doesn't make it any less true. This dude is an awful interviewer, I've watched a handful of his videos with UAP guests and it's consistently poor

27. tim dodd the everyday astronaut.. he can answer all of your moon questions.
    or look up a channel called Homemade Documentaries

28. I believe that remote viewing is related in some way with the research that Jacobo Grinberg did

29. Low-key just saying but, ever since about the same time this podcast dropped, I've been getting a crap ton of ads to build submarines for the navy 💀

30. Thats an admiral that prefers his sandwiches cut into quarters.

31. I had to stop this. Some of the stupidest crap I've ever heard. The Navy guy is almost as dumb as the host.

32. A couple rich guys talking about pricey fishing trips.

33. What was point of this 😐 no direction at all

Comments are closed.