Read Time:1 Minute, 49 Second



Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: [email protected]

Sponsorship inquiries: [email protected]

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9c4EeHRlWlE

Code Blue Cam’s YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@CodeBlueCam

Sources:

Court Records (Chertisha Camacho)- https://bit.ly/3WkxDP0

Court Records (Mario Camacho)- https://bit.ly/3BD7d1f

California v. Greenwood- https://bit.ly/3MgQvtA

United States v. Hedrick- https://bit.ly/3Ipip5v

Wis. Stat. § 946.41- https://bit.ly/3oeJ128

Wisconsin Jury Instructions (Resisting)- https://bit.ly/3obyJje

Wisconsin Jury Instruction (Obstructing)- https://bit.ly/3WiheKD

Houston v. Hill- https://bit.ly/36hULEM

State v. Oleston- https://bit.ly/3BGIJEp

State v. Ferguson- https://bit.ly/3BD8a9P

United States v. Jones- https://bit.ly/3p6UQBY

United States v. Mitchell- https://bit.ly/43aMNIA

Segura v. United States- https://bit.ly/3tmc6YQ

Illinois v. McArthur- https://bit.ly/3pVQ4x0

Marathon Cty. Code of Ord. § 9.21- https://bit.ly/3MDkJIp

source

Audit the Audit

About Post Author

Audit the Audit

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

37 thoughts on “Illegally Arrested For DEFENDING Her Brother!

  1. A "C"? Really? I have watched enough of your videos to know this girl hit ever ladder on the "probable" cause, most notably interfering with an investigation. She does not live in the home, she was not even present until after making contact with the brother. She literally had no business in the investigation and was hindering. To have channels like this is important to help weed out the complexity of laws, but it is a double edge sword when you educate us on these things and enables us to spot when YOU'RE integrity is in question

  2. No. She was not illegally arrested and this is total BS. She was interfering with an ongoing investigation into a member of the military who had a backpack stolen. Luckily an airtag led the police and the investigation to this house. Once they confirmed the location of the backpack, not to mention the suspicious amount of wallets and purses in the garbage, the police had ample probable cause to issue an arrest and a search warrant of the property (which in the original video, they got one signed and retrieved the stolen goods because they were not able to enter the property). They even gave the brother the benefit of the doubt and issued the search warrant at a later date. The sister, knowing that the stolen property was in the house, was defiant and non-compliant with the officers who already confirmed the stolen backpack in the property. This video is really grabbing at straws here, the police did exactly what they were trained for and treated them with dignity.

  3. yes, the cops should have waited, and gotten a search warrant. however, the fact that there were so many bags in the trash, and they found the property that was stolen, i would be willing to bet sister and brother both are stealing bags, and going thru them in that house. its not cool of the cops to enter the property and go through the trash that was not out for public rifling, but…. i don't feel bad for this family. sister was crazy. and good on the cops for using restraint and being mostly professional thru the whole interaction. Sometimes you need to look at the greater of two evils. I guarantee you they are investigating him for all the bags in his trash and stolen property reports around the city. However, if they are investigating him, and they take it to a trial, couldn't the cops have evidence thrown out due to the fact they violated his rights? So if they found proof he stole from over 40 people all of that can be screwed now because they obtained evidence illegally.

  4. Dont give Mario that kind of leniency lol. He stated at the very beginning, 'I know everyone here, I know what is in this house and theres definitely no backpack here." No chance whatsoever of claiming the backpack was there without his knowledge.

    On the military document side…. losing a military ID is a pain in the m-fn ass bc they have name, dob, and social on it. Exactly what a thief needs to steal your identity. Never lost mine, thank goodness. Glad this guy got his back. If it involved my military items and I had an air pod ping to show cops, I wouldve called them too.

  5. Classic cop paradox reasoning for arresting someone.

    Civilian: "Why am I being arrested"
    Cop: "Bc you're resisting arrest"

    Chicken or the egg, huh? what? 🤔

  6. That's why you should never open the door to a police officer… if he is investigating he must make a decision wether or not enter the house by force with the information he has…

  7. funny i seen this video on another channel with a title of "racist cops" alot was cut out including the part that the bag had a gps tagger and there was trash cans overfilling with purses and no mentions have there actually being weed in the guys house Lol

    seeing mostly the full video now… ya nothing was really racist about it Lol

  8. I normally support you but on this the cops were in the right. I have seen the full body cameras and she was obstructing. She also made threats to the officers family including wishing rape on his wife. Take the L on this one.

  9. Yea… Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit the Audit gets an L for this video.
    The Officers did nothing wrong and arrested a criminal and got the backpack back to its rightful owner.

  10. There was stolen property there flat out .. lets be honest. Police would've never been the if they would have never stole facts . Cops don't show up to ur house for nothing/ there is crazy case's.

  11. She was totally in the wrong. She was on an ego trip & was protecting the stolen property that she & her brother stole off good people. That poor guy & his wife, a baby at home, himself a veteran, just want their stuff back. Air tags showing in that location – I mean, these thieves are SO STUPID, they throw out the wallets/purses in their OWN garbage cans? Talk about lazy, lol! They don't even know what an air tag looks like & this is how they bang out the rent? Some people meet jail halfway.
    Of COURSE they're smoking weed. That's all these career criminals DO is steal & smoke weed. Gotta laugh at the USA though – you still haven't legalized weed & your drinking age is 21 ???? Why does everyone insist on smoking weed before (or while) driving? That's impairment. A DUI. If you're in the car while others smoke, you will test positive for it too. That's a DUI – a felony.
    When the officer shut the door on her howling face, it was a relief I felt deeply. Nobody who screams over others with such consistency, has anything valuable to say. Imagine a jury watching this video, they might finally see how frustrating it can be for officers. They sign up for this, I expect officers to suck that up & deal with it – but it wasn't long ago that a woman like that would've been hogtied or even knocked out just to get silence – which would've been very wrong, but the abuse people hurl at officers now that they think video footage excuses their behavior, has tripled. You give them an inch, what do they take!
    Furthermore – "I don't have my license on me", well, you know what that means 90% of the time, right?

    If someone has a felony & officers pull them over, it's lawful for the officers to search the entire car with or without permission, correct? What about the felon's house? What if the felon is in another person's home, or another person's car – does that render the car/home to be searched without warrant or probable cause?

    And don't they have meters now that detect marijuana in the air? Anyone could lie about smelling weed. Could that be given to officers to establish probable cause? I can smell weed easily, even when driving, and I can tell what car it's coming from – and I haven't smoked weed since high school (1988). Whether or not I've had THC gummies, on the other hand, that's another story.

Comments are closed.

1706331098 Maxresdefault.jpg Previous post $500 vs $1300 Racing Seats
1706385753 Maxresdefault.jpg Next post Grove Street – Born II Lose [Official Visualiser]