Read Time:1 Minute, 59 Second



Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: [email protected]

Sponsorship inquiries: [email protected]

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztcFIcJmzP4

Officer Giannantonio’s body camera: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0cjdSxrGnY

Officer Brown’s body camera: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK_i8hJbkkY

Auditors Of America (Last Days Of Freedom)’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@AuditorsOfAmericaLDOF

James Freeman’s coverage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRXAEr0qhbw

Article-
http://bit.ly/3Y641V9

Sources:

Tenn. Code § 39-13-101- http://bit.ly/405WpDM

Tenn. Code § 39-13-102- http://bit.ly/3Y698V7

Tenn. Code § 39-11-106- http://bit.ly/3RgbKh4

State v. Sims- http://bit.ly/3DocFWU

Tenn. Code § 39-13-302- http://bit.ly/3HF21he

Tenn. Code § 39-13-303- http://bit.ly/3XZsbk6

Tenn. Code § 39-13-301- http://bit.ly/3JyXKNs

Tenn. Code § 39-16-403- http://bit.ly/3jdsmte

Tenn. Code § 39-16-402- http://bit.ly/3XQ5Ndl

Tenn. Code § 39-14-405- http://bit.ly/3XPly3Y

Property line- http://bit.ly/3HdxENo

Tenn. Code § 39-14-502- http://bit.ly/40fW9lA

Tenn. Code § 39-14-503- http://bit.ly/3DpT09d

source

Audit the Audit

About Post Author

Audit the Audit

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

36 thoughts on “Cop Defends Citizen Against Another Cop!

  1. Forget he is a cop for a moment.

    Imagine some homeless people drop a bag of trash in front of your home you work hard to maintain.
    You ask them to pick it up, they do.

    Then as you part ways you notice the homeless dude is now recording you and your home.

    I wouldn't react like this, but I'd definitely be weirded out by that.

  2. Officer Brown was just trying to protect a fellow officer from prosecution by trying to make the complaint not to pursue charges just because the offend was a fellow officer. If it was the other way around the plaintiff would’ve been charged and arrested. Why does this police have different rules for them and the general public. Please explain this to me. I thought that there’s only one law for the entire country

  3. This is why we need less police right here. If the man in question was throwing trash in people's yards and people were allowed to handle it themselves, the guy wnds up with a black eye and a headache. It's like no one has any accountability for anything anymore. People act like jerks because it's their right to. Cops act like assholes bc they have way too much power. Even if officer metro guy gets in trouble, now the guy who recorded them is probably going to end up in and out of court for every little thing he does wrong. This is made even worse if he didn't toss any trash on the guy's lawn I intenrionally.

    And yes, our rights are important. Incredibly important, and I'm a bit surprised the guy with the phone did not immediately start swinging at the dude who came up and slapped at the phone. Both of these ppl are well below the level of character I would consider decent ppl. Just my opinion. Throwing trash on the ground in front of your kid. Going after someone when they are with a woman and a kid over something very minor at best. Unreal.

  4. I'd be shocked if the good cop is still employed in the force. Ones like her who don't mindlessly back their co-workers get weeded out quickly and relegated to administrative work if allowed to keep their jobs.

  5. I'd like to look into the D.A.'s office and see if they gave the case to the grand jury in an ethical way. If they half-assed the charges, the grand jury would not have been given accurate facts. There's some accountability there and the voters of the district might like to know if their D.A. is unethical.

  6. These are the types of cops who necessitate an even lower score than a “F”…

    Along with the fellow officers who attempted to downplay and ignore officer Thorogood’s actions.

  7. I don’t like how this channel gives cops marks for being professional. This is the minimum we expect from police and isn’t something noteworthy deserving of praise. Cops get away with so much that now if they aren’t outright violating someone this is seen as exemplary.

  8. Two crooked male cops and one good female officer says it all. The guys aren't concerned with the law, just pursuing justice according to their low standards. Thank goodness the lady cop never forgot her training.

  9. "got it on camera" pops up quite a lot.
    It enhances the necessity to record any interactions in public if it is within your rights.

    I'm not saying that the female cop is bad or anything, but I do recognize the fact that if it weren't on camera, that other cop wouldve not left and protected officer thoroughgood.

    A problem with law is that it will always be reactive, as when it is not, it's tyranny.
    There is no perfect balance in between. Any case that's met needs probable cause, and especially new cases where it hasn't been encountered before. Therefore unless one side has irrefutable evidence, the result is up for grabs.

    Tl:dr; law can only be reactive so secure evidence (most likely camera/video) when you have the rights to (public property etc).

  10. The cop saying "I don't care what's on video, i support him". That's the thin blue line, propagated by free masons and police fraternities. They will hurt you if it protects the fraternity. Do not trust them.

Comments are closed.

1705092814 Maxresdefault.jpg Previous post $20 a Month for Heated Seats!?
1705093181 Maxresdefault.jpg Next post World’s Most Expensive Coffee