Read Time:1 Minute, 50 Second



Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: [email protected]

Sponsorship inquiries: [email protected]

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMdNtn6Zagk

All Trendy News’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@alltrendynews1838

Sources:

Article- https://bit.ly/42haTk7

Tex. Pen. Code §22.01- https://bit.ly/3ORfEhh

Tex. Pen. Code §1.07- https://bit.ly/45FtysQ

Gomez v. State- https://bit.ly/43zsl4q

Foster v. State- https://bit.ly/3qqkI1L

Hiibel v. Nevada- https://bit.ly/3nYdxIV

Tex. Pen. Code §38.02 – https://bit.ly/43dl22y

Navarette v. California- https://bit.ly/2Nzuo6W

Brother v. State- https://bit.ly/3qgxVKx

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 14.03- https://bit.ly/3oGUPKS

Woods v. State- https://bit.ly/3ORfHtt

Johnson v. State- https://bit.ly/3P8gvuj

Dyar v. State- https://bit.ly/43fMwor

Goldberg v. State- https://bit.ly/43gfYdR

Virginia v. Moore- https://bit.ly/3bIlhJT

U.S. v. Lopez- https://bit.ly/3qkYrm7

source

Audit the Audit

About Post Author

Audit the Audit

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

48 thoughts on “Karen Discovers She’s Not Above The Law

  1. I love it when a Karen says “I’m not going to jail” lol 😂 like what do they think, that a cop is gonna say “Oh okay then” 😂 like NO!

    5:05 Hahahaha did she really claim a racist motive by the employee? Like this women is a white middle age blond woman, claiming racism as if she’s suffered so much oppression & discrimination & her white privilege is such a burden to her 😂

  2. I don't know how the cops don't get an F here. They were completely wrong about the limits of their authority. The woman gets an L for "loser." She knew her rights, but she's a prime example of the people that currently pose the greatest threat to this country.

  3. You will go to jail if you don't identify yourself to Law Enforcement unless the laws has changed. What if there's been a crime in the area and Officers has spotted someone leaving the scene of the crime. Does they not have to identify themselves so the Officers can make sure they're not the Suspect? You have to identify yourself to Authorities, that's in every state of America.

  4. Besides the law, Man this lady is dangerous. You see how she tried to put it off on a black person. This is how many of us been getting killed over hundreds of years. She know she did it, and she say she’s a Christian wow. Lock her ass up.

  5. By the way, Karen, even if the cops are lying, that's almost never against the law nor grounds for excluding evidence. They can lie to you, you can't lie to them. Fair? Probably not, but that's the law. Frazier v. Cupp (1969)

  6. I cannot BELIEVE that people like this ACTUALLY exist, and aren't just a meme.. how can anyone go through life and be taken seriously like this.

  7. What these idiots seem to forget is that even in the scenario where you’re not legally obligated to identify yourself, what’s the harm in doing it if you’re honest and the one in the right? Or even if you weren’t in the right? It’s simply being polite

Comments are closed.

1701891649 Maxresdefault.jpg Previous post Most Expensive Paint Colors Ever
1701892001 Maxresdefault.jpg Next post Spot The Hidden People For $10,000