An ethical dilemma

46 thoughts on “An ethical dilemma”

1. He said no homo sounding gay asf lmao!

2. Bro chose to loot his victims💀

3. With that reasoning, the 5 people option is better since 5 people have more goods than 1 on average

4. Let the train kill the five people, then murder the witness. Then catch up to the train and murder/rob everyone on board hoping like hell nobody sees it.. Wait, this isnt rdr2..

5. Patches?

6. Wow, finally a take I’ve never heard.

7. Most complex version of "eat the rich" I've ever heard.

8. Who gives therapy to the therapists?

9. The point is to provoke thought and he just gave up. That "I guess" explains everything man is just participating at being human.

10. Uuuuhh, for real tho? We need to know. Are you good?

11. If we wanna actually talk philosophy, I took an intro phil class last semester and an overwhelming number of students said it would be morally wrong not to pull the lever. My stance, if an action is to happen without your interference anyways, you can't be morally held accountable for your passiveness. Why should you bare the guilt of deciding someone else's death? If you don't pull the lever, you're not a bad person. If you do, you saved five other people but deemed a dude, who would have otherwise lived, to death. I would argue that you would be morally right to pull the lever, but not morally wrong to do nothing. You're just playing life in spectator mode, no one should fault anyone for that

12. I agree with geck, eat the rich!

13. Have any of y’all played high on life!? Lmao let’s just say I had WAY too much fun with the trolley scenario 🤣

14. Logically you kill the five with the trolly so you only have to have one witness that you can brain wash via massive amounts of LSD and Bath salts.

15. Unless you are the one who put them on the tracks, I'd say walk away or you'll be the one going to prison for killing them no matter which track you choose 😂

16. You leave the switch alone and let the train go straight. Then you switch it and walk away to take care of the other guy

17. If neither choice is a existential threat to life on earth I would leave it alone

18. I would switch the tracks as the train bits the rail crossing and derail the train, killing everyone inside

19. The one person on the track is meant to be a loved one lol wtf

20. Ayo geck are you sure we need therapy?

21. Multi-track drifting

22. I love this. You can't logically argue to get people to have less shitty morals. So sometimes it's better to just one up them the same way you would s conspiracy theorist. They say the moon landing was faked. You say the moon is a hologram. They say the earth is flat. You say the earth is actually a donut. It's the closest you can really come to demonstrating the arbitrary preposterousness of what they are saying.

23. just half pull the lever so the trolley skips up and kills all the people inside instead

24. “How do I reverse the train so I can do both?”

25. The hustle never stops

26. I like how no one has come up with the solution of building a makeshift derailer to prevent anyone from dying.

27. Sociopath Gecko

28. Real problem is how do I derail the train so it will kill all 6 people + everyone in the train

29. Regular Therapist from Google: "I believe its better not to ask yourself those questions to determine whether you're a good person or not. I believe it is in your best interest to do what you believe that's necessary for the greater good. "

    Therapist from Bing:

30. Either he knows, or doesn't know. But the trolley dilemma is one good way to tell if someone is a psychopath.

31. Sick move its all about the loot

32. This is gecks way of saying dont hit me with this idiotic trolley shit.

33. If it’s the person I love you best believe the 5 are out of luck

34. "You know what, a crime is happening either way, let's go for the bigger crime."

35. Gecko is all about the loot

36. The trolly dilemma is a trap. It’s suppose to put social issues on the individual and their Ethical standards while the question should be why is our Society tying down ppl to a trolley system to have an individual choose who dies. Don’t ask which one but ask why and how can we stop this from happening.

37. We all learned something about the frog today

38. If you pull the lever at exactly the right time you can make the train drift both tracks and kill all six

39. If I can save one person quicker than five in a burning building I’m saving the one person and the five will have to figure it out on their own. I’m not taking the time to save five when I can save one person’s life and my own. That’s my opinion in that scenario. But such a simple decision comes down to having the time and it depends on the situation. It’s obvious you save the five by sacrificing the one in the train scenario and the scenario I developed gives way to more ethical conundrums. What if you had someone you deeply loved among the five and you didn’t know that one person trapped in the other, easier to access room? Do you just save yourself?

40. In this dilemma are the brakes fucked or what?

41. d

42. Complete psycho path take
    The internet -so deep

43. On the other hand ritchy ritch could be thankful for being rescued

44. I’d pretend it was stuck, cuz imagine your the one person and your fine you aren’t going to get hurt then someone flicks a lever to kill you.

45. Gangster.

46. RPG loot rules

Comments are closed.