A Deep Look at A.I. Generated Music

31 thoughts on “A Deep Look at A.I. Generated Music”

1. This is disgusting

2. It's not AI that is creating it, it's the creative process of the PROGRAMMERS who wrote the AI software. It's never AI.

3. Oh my God, it's stolen from other artists, ban this technology!!!

4. AI doesn't exist. These specific applications (whether generating faces or music) are just pattern recognition, indexing, algorithms and fast machines. There is nothing intelligent about any of this. Also there is no imagination whatsoever. Also the comment about not needing programmers input is nonsensical. There is also nothing "deep" about deep learning. It's just a well indexed database.

5. What about the tekno rather than cheesy shit tracks!

6. Have you ever heard of Nuostems? It is the best stem extraction software that exists. It uses the Demucs v3 algorithm

7. The masters would know how to manipulate ai tools to create music. I think maybe ai is just the next stage in art production. And perhaps music software plugins would be made to use ai but not for ai to use the musicians when creating music.

8. You know entertainment companies are already looking at this. Add information from hit songs like BPM, key, genre, lyric subject, melody (if any) range and placement, danceability and how much teenage girls like it and they will have a cheap, never-ending source of "new" product that won't need creative minds at all. Then add sexy AI bots to perform the music and you won't need drug addled musicians or expensive, troublesome divas at either. Modernization has become de-humanization.

9. The only pure music is aCappella

10. I love ai

11. I assume that those pop rock or ambient "bridges" are much easier for AI to reproduce than "actual beautiful melodies", even the simplest ones like "music box dancer", let alone symphonies…not in a million year…lol

12. The AI sucks and the music is horrible.

13. Great. So creativity will pretty much die cause everyone will just use AI to make music for them. So much for my dreams.

14. AI generates horror-house.

15. a.i. will f up painting, music…well art in general. i guess we´ll be left with theatre, live music, graffiti etc. thank the godess theres skateboarding. come and try me on this one.

    all jokes aside… a.i. will find it´s way soon or later :/

16. This is music that is playing when the police shows up to a house because of a terrible smell.

17. Everything AI does is fake, soulless and heartless with no emotion or point in what it does.

18. I never once heard the word 'melody' in the whole of this video.

19. Brains are just squishy computers.

20. and now, look at stable diffusion… how far we've come with IMAGES ALONE in one year!

21. this is so sick actually.wav is actually pretty sick

22. Creativity of the collage (a piece of art made by sticking various different materials such as photographs and pieces of paper or fabric on to a backing) has been explored by artists since 1910. A little later they experimented with realism as in sur-realism. Many experiments were "auto creative" wich means that random fragments were applied to works of art. Selection was and still is an interaction of the human being.

    In music the modern approach was much more formal, initially around the skill of the player (Satie, Stravinsky) but after WWII increasingly more formal, mathematical, mechanical, serial and a-tonal.

    In post-modern times artists mostly shop & select in the modern history, largely creating atmospheric muzak or kitch-imagery, sometimes profound works of art. The examples from AI creations are just "collages" from predictions, as in corrective or additional text in messaging apps.

    Creativity and intelligence are concepts that have not yet yielded a well-defined knowledge of them. Machine learning is not intelligence and although it "creates", it's not a creative act in itself. It predicts outcomes from previously created art and photography. The process of creating AI machine learning software and selecting from the outcomes, is creative of course.

23. I just want a ai to talk to

24. Check Metropolis 1927 film. This is were we are heading. Slave society, without personality.

25. Creativity is learned. The intuition that is needed for creativity is learned the same way AI learns, by looking at existing examples and experimentation. Over time AIs will have better brains than humans (bigger neural networks). The soul, inspiration and thought process you mention that are lacking are all also learned by human brains. AI will learn all these things as well.

26. The end all be all argument that proves humans' arrogance in this question: tell me a single thing that a human has invented that was an 100% original, individual idea. Something that don't just build upon and combines other ideas. Whatever invention, a piece of art, a physical thing, an abstract idea in one's mind…

    Hint: there aren't any

27. “Yeah I do a little production” makes a heavenly beat

28. This is extremely far from usability. An AI creating a drum loop that can be recreated manually in a snap of a finger is not impressive at all.
    Using wav audio directly to sample the data is interesting. However that is also far from usability with that weird artifacts and noise. Let alone recreating a record that is convincing, a single instrument that is modeled digitally sounds so fake. Forget a full blown mix.. show me a digitally modeled violin or saxophone that sounds like the real thing.. so these guys should start small and do the bigger things later.
    currently we are seeing in AI generated art that is hard to tell it is not created by a human., When it comes to music, we are pretty far from that. I believe that is a good thing!!

29. AI should really be made illegal.

30. I just made a crazy video on "As it was" by Harry styles- but every lyric is an ay generated image . you should definitely jump by :))

31. Am I the only one who thinks ai technology like this is very sad? I always knew that automation will be implemented more with time, but the thought that in 20 years more than 50% of the worlds jobs will be taken away really scares me. Ive always been very excited for the future. Until recently I learned about programs like these and many others that basically eliminate the need of human existence.

    I've done a lot of research exploring this topic and it is inevitable that in about 20 years or so, most of the worlds population won't have a job. These people wont just missing a job, theyll be missing a career and more importantly a purpose in the lives.
    So they won't be able to earn an income and die right?

    Not exactly , economists have thought of a solution to tis problem, UBI or (universal basic income) is their solution to this so called "new world". The idea is that every citizen will get a set salary from the goverment (e.g $1 000) per month and be able to survive and pay for basic needs. In my terms this sounds like a really sad lifestyle. Living a life without a career sounds very boring, if you have a job that you hate then you'll probably be excited for this, but for those whole thrive on their passionate career like me, then this sounds like a future that I don't want to be apart of

    I have defiantly gone a bit too deep into this topic😂 but pls let me know what you guys think? Id love to see other peoples views. it is our future at the end of the day, shouldn't we be able to have a say on what we do with our lives???🤷‍♂

Comments are closed.