Read Time:13 Second

Today we discuss record labels… and the worst deals they gave to rappers

Thanks for watching! Please like and subscribe if you enjoyed!

instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/louaista/

Twitter
https://twitter.com/Louaista

TikTok:
https://www.tiktok.com/@louaista?lang=en

source

Louaista

About Post Author

Louaista

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

45 thoughts on “Hip-Hop’s Worst Record Deals..

  1. Just so everyone knows, every genre of music has labels that have these crappy deals. Not just Hip Hop. And it's not just Black artists who get screwed. In fact, Black Hip Hop artists actually get paid more than most other genres because it's so easy to promote and sell an artist that is in the world's most famous genre. As well they are a single artist and not a band in which you have numerous people and equipment to deal with. Which Requires said groups and bands having to payout the label more money. The issue with many Hip Hop artists is living a lifestyle of flashy jewelry, houses, cars, etc.

  2. Ma$e had had the worst deal with Bad Boy Records, Mase wanted to join G-Unit Records back in 2005, but P.Diddy asked 50 Cent 3 million to make Mase free from his Bad Boy deal, that is the reason we never get any Mase album, because he is still under contractual obligation with Diddy-Bad Boy!

  3. Any artist who don't have any record label I'm prefer interscope. You wanna know why? Did you ever heard any artist from interscope got problem with payments? Before you sign with them make sure you got best record. If you songs trash that owner laber giving a55 not the cash you got passed….suiiii that's bar๐Ÿ˜‚

  4. You can say NBA young boy has a horrible deal but a company that powerful prolly the reason he keeps getting off light on all these cases. Atlantic knows people who know people prolly greasing the judges

  5. I don't understand. These guys are gangsters with guns that'll catch bodies at the blink of an eye, why don't they do that to the record labels?

  6. All Iโ€™m hearing is โ€œI didnโ€™t read the contract and the record company only took care of themselvesโ€ yep thatโ€™s what any company does. They put the best terms FOR THEM in the contract and itโ€™s up to the artist to read it and decide if they want to sign. Theyโ€™re not victims. They were given the contracts and didnโ€™t read them!

  7. All Iโ€™m hearing is โ€œI didnโ€™t read the contract and the record company only took care of themselvesโ€ yep thatโ€™s what any company does. They put the best terms FOR THEM in the contract and itโ€™s up to the artist to read it and decide if they want to sign. Theyโ€™re not victims. They were given the contracts and didnโ€™t read them!

  8. Labels are a necessary evil. Russ ran up numbers independently because he had a rich friend who absorbed all his recording/marketing/promotional costs. Plus he is white. Notice how xxx and young dolph who had the upper hand with their contracts are both dead. Hmmm.

  9. I think this video is fantastic the only thing thatโ€™s missing is the argument that the labels invest millions into these artists at a time when that investment isnโ€™t available

  10. In the social media and YouTube age you are better off being independent. Everyone has a shot to blow up now when you used to have to do some crazy stuff to get noticed snd signed. Thats with any form of entertainment. These labels made their bed and I hope more and more people go solo.

  11. I wonder who gives them these contracts? If only mf would be focused on the real opps ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚. Mf slide on anybody on the block but mf trap you and use you and throw you away ainโ€™t opps? Sad

  12. What I'm seeing is performers who negate the artist behind the scenes… there's a commonality in music that revolves around the performers not acknowledging the artist and absorbing both credit and profit. It's always argued that the artists benefit from the vicarious influence of their music, but that is not true. If the value originally came from the performer, they would have experienced the key process in artist development that is protection of the rights and works, meaning they'd have leverage to negotiate. most artists in bad deals are there because they are acting according to instruction or script; that said most people mentioned except Lupe Fiasco went to a pop market. their audience literal prefers the same 100-200 songwriters performed by different actors… hence Colby Cailat's- Love Song having the famous refusal that she then flips into a catchy pop tune; her market only digests romance… MTS market only digest rebellious expression as a crafted display of repulse because that is how women feel about men… same with TLC. So the characterization and development, including the reality that they are not independently developing these artistic concepts and do actually owe the label and platform negates the claims of bad deals… hence: "Megan you know you ain't created that anthem…"

  13. No one wants to talk about the real reason these deals are bad (and the music is bad). It's the people who own the labels and the people who do this distribution. They always come from a certain group and they aren't the same group as the artists. They would never have their children out there making degenerate trash and then getting ripped off.

  14. The thing about living under capitalism is that no matter what, youโ€™re always going to face some degree of exploitation. The extent of that exploitation is based what you accept.

Comments are closed.

1723473194 Maxresdefault.jpg Previous post Grow Organic Cannabis the EASY Way! | Clackamas Coots Soil Mix Explained
1723478132 Maxresdefault.jpg Next post Kaonashi – Passing Through The Hourglass (Official Music Video)