Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: [email protected]
Sponsorship inquiries: [email protected]
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNhpph03X4Mx
rickey pouncil’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@rickeypouncil
Sources:
Minn. Stat. § 169.15- http://bit.ly/3ZrF9qU
Minn. Stat. § 169.18- http://bit.ly/3ZlhTLq
State v. Ellanson- http://bit.ly/3FZHFOt
Whren v. United States- https://bit.ly/3gX0kyJ
State v. Wiegand- http://bit.ly/3ntCxMe
Rodriguez v. United States- https://bit.ly/2LS1sqc
Stanwood v. Stolts- http://bit.ly/3KfisRB
U.S. v. Fickas- http://bit.ly/3GoVjLp
U.S. v. Beck- http://bit.ly/3ZpkJPt
U.S. v. Brown- http://bit.ly/3LWws53
Knudsen v. Comm’r of Pub. Safety- http://bit.ly/3ntY8E7
Bumper v. North Carolina- http://bit.ly/3nxuvSB
U.S. v. Lattimore- http://bit.ly/3M0RiQE
source
About Post Author
Audit the Audit
Average Rating
40 thoughts on “Harassed For Going UNDER The Speed Limit”
Comments are closed.
More Stories
The P.Diddy SCANDAL (Lawsuit Details Revealed)
Find the shots at: https://www.magicmind.com/scornelia code SCORNELIA20 gets you up to 56% off your first subscription for the next 10...
The Poorest Place in America: Pine Ridge Reservation
Big Dog Merch: https://tommygmcgee.com/ Patreon Exclusive Clips: https://www.patreon.com/tommygmcgee Skate Park Go Fund ... source
How the US Debt Crisis Affects Us All
Go to https://aura.com/coldfusion to get a 14-day free trial and see if any of your data has been exposed. The...
These Cops MESSED UP Big Time!
Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit Submit your videos here: [email protected] Sponsorship inquiries: [email protected] Welcome to Audit...
Inside Denver’s Homeless Crisis
Big Dog Merch: https://tommygmcgee.com/ Patreon Exclusive Clips: https://www.patreon.com/tommygmcgee Filmers: ... source
The Scammer Who Sold A Fake Country
Go to https://brilliant.org/coldfusion for 30-day free trial + 20% off! Just when you think you know the depths of the...
I hope he goes after that cop and makes a complaint
DWB
This cop is over the line. A C- is far too kind in my opinion.
"Am I free to go?" should be your mantra here..
When an officer askes general questions, respond with general answers:
"Where are you going?"
To another place.
"Is there anything in your car I should be aware of?"
Can you show me a list of things you should be aware of?
Always record, as there may be repercussions if you bruise an officers weak ego.
Let me get this straight: he got pulled over for being in the middle lane, going the speed limit? So…driving?
When I drive alone, I have my messenger bag in the passenger seat. Am I now a criminal? Oh wait, I'm the right color so probably not. A case of straight up racism in this one.
Its sad when just because you dont beat the civilian you get a c
35 mins standing out in the cold on side of a dangerous road when he could of been home warm and safe
See I will disagree with this rating for one simple line I’m not entirely sure was picked up given the grades at hand:
He was basically told that if he had not been given consent, he would have to stand outside the car in the cold OR sit in the back of a patrol car, and this caused him to give consent, not the drug sniffing dog itself.
I feel like this was overlooked as a minor line when in fact this greatly impacted the decision to consent to his search, this was a threat. Sitting in the back of the patrol car could, for all we know given how on the spot this was, have been a great fear for him and likewise could have played into any body cam footage from either officer if twisted into some specific prosecutor angled story, and standing out in the cold with only a hoodie and sweats and not proper winter clothing would be torture on its own.
Also to be clear the back of the patrol car on its own was still a horrible offer, as the windows would be rolled down to expose him to the cold air regardless, thought to point this out.
I would at least revise the grade to F and A- respectively, though this is just me. The officer either knowingly, or was too dim witted to realize, forced his hand in order to get consent given the desperate weather circumstances.
That cop deserves an F any way you look at it. Mr. Council should have an A.
In the officers' defense, most of internal drug trafficking is done with rental vehicles.
Definitely police harassment
Stopping a person on a icyroad whit cars flying by just inches away is dangerus on its own!
Is ATA religious?
Cop deserves a F
"I'm not going to write you a ticket"… Conversation over. He is free to leave. Let the officer know there is no consentual contact and attempt to leave.
"im not trying to coerce you."
Also officer: your suspicious because you wont answer me therfore if you dont let me search your car i will do it by force.
witch hunter. don't let witch hunters search your car. don't answer their questions.
C-?! I'm sure he would've shot him if he didn't cooperate. F– would be more correct. Throw the corrupt cop in jail.
Throw the corrupt cop in jail for life.
wheres this cop every time theres some oold lady in front of me doing 30 in a 60
My dad would be screwed lol.
Holy that cop is dangerous
He doesn't know his rights
And people wonder why black folks hate cops smh.
How the officer didn't get an F is wild. Clear case of racial profiling against the victim.
Never talk to the cops. Remain silent. Cops are the enemy.
That piece of shi knew what he was doing then lied. He deserves to be in prison. Keep him out in the cold. Racist cop
So being careful is now illegal? The guy seemed educated and not impaired at all why go through all that?
This pig should be fired
Come on, they would of fake hit with the dog….
Im 2 seconds in and based on the title alone – GOOD! About damn time someone gets pulled over for going under the limit. Also, do some left lane cruisers as well. 90% of road rage incidents would be eliminated if careless people followed the law of not cruising in the left lane and getting over for faster drivers
I normally would never suggest volunterily letting the cops search ur car. But when they threatened the K9 search it might be the best option. K9's can be taught to react from certain commands form cops. Also they are only about 85% accurate. False alerts are pretty common. Then they would have torn his car up.
For those of you who get mad at his grading scale.
You don't understand his grading scale. C- isn't a pass. Anything under an A- is a fail. B+ – F is simply the severity of the failure. If "F" was the only failure, everyone would get an "F" and there would be no distinction between how badly someone fails. Someone who get a C- simply isn't as bad as someone who gets an F.
In the world of violence grading, there is a difference between slapping someone in the face and stabbing them in the shoulder, and slicing their throat open. Tha face slap fails with a B-, the shoulder stab fails with a D-, and the throat slash gets an F.
Truthfully ATA would do better with a scale of 1 – 10. A "grade" confuses a lot of you as you're used to a "C" being a "passing grade". When ATA gives a "C-", I know the cop failed. When a citizen gets a B+, that is also a failure. The failure being giving the tyrant permission to search the car.
I dont want to make you let me search the car. But im going to hold you untill u let me in the super cold winter
4:58 this cop fishing
Multiple criminal indicators = profiling
Yet another fuckin racist cop…makes me sick
DWB we all know it
WHY IS THE PIG TALKING SO FAST , IS HE ON DRUGS ??