Read Time:1 Minute, 37 Second



Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: [email protected]

Sponsorship inquiries: [email protected]

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDxQg4W0FiQ

Corners News’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@CornersLaredo

Sources:

Texas v. Johnson- https://bit.ly/3CRAe8K

Tex. Pen. Code § 42.01- https://bit.ly/42lo3OQ

Brown v. Wilson- https://bit.ly/3Ol995o

Whren v. United States- https://bit.ly/3gX0kyJ

Tex. Transp. Code § 545.104- https://bit.ly/3vSCz4r

Tex. Transp. Code § 543.001- https://bit.ly/496cfSC

Atwater v. City of Lago Vista- https://bit.ly/3hj50z3

Virginia v. Moore- https://bit.ly/3bIlhJT

Oliver v. Arnold- https://bit.ly/447wOvM

Nieves v. Bartlett- https://bit.ly/3Ejbysy

source

Audit the Audit

About Post Author

Audit the Audit

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

49 thoughts on ““Good” Cop Stops Bad Cop From Harassing Citizen!

  1. The sergeant shouldn't really have said that the officer "did nothing wrong." The sergeant himself recognized that the officer was treating her differently and that it could be a problem because it was WRONG. I also found it ironic that she was within her first amendment rights to express herself, but the officer was "wrongly" (as we already determined) taking her into custody and yet she got the lecture about "having to get over it."

  2. "if officer Akres had done anything wrong he wouldn't be here right now."

    Let's see, he's clearly retaliating against a citizen but he didn't do anything wrong and that's why he's still here right now. He's arresting a woman for a supposed offense that anybody else would be ticketed and drive away from. But he didn't do anything wrong or he wouldn't be here right now. Yeah, right! Pathetic!

  3. The police 👮 need to get their feelings in check 😢not to totally violate the law are cops 👮 babies 😢 then are cry babies for no reason. Is this what we the people need this kind of police officers 👮 to do this. Are we in china 🇨🇳 or the USA 🇺🇸

  4. If she's so afraid and traumatized by this officer, she wouldn't be inviting interactions with him regardless of her legal standing in doing so. If you're afraid of someone who has the power to pull you over, you don't flip them off.

  5. I literally just did a case brief for Atwater v. Lago Vista. The case law is reasonable. You can't be leaving it up to officers to decide if an arrest is constitutional if it's a misdemeanor, which is what the courts decided and the reason why they have discretion to arrest or not but that either decision is constitutional, as long as the officer witnessed the offense. That way, they can arrest if reasonable and not arrest when not. As long as this lady committed the traffic offense, he absolutely could have arrested her, regardless of how you feel about it. The court has made it clear. BTW, Gail Atwater was driving with a 3 year old and 5 year old unbuckled in the front seat of a truck. As far as I'm concerned that deserved an arrest.

  6. I don't understand any context where a cop turning off their camera while on duty is appropriate. Can anyone tell me any reason they should be allowed to do so? Genuine question, I'm very curious about this honestly

  7. And more than likely that uniformed-🔵 psychopath is still employed and punishing citizens, right?
    He'd be better off operating a front end loader at a garbage dump.

  8. This is not a good cop vs bad cop… that so called good cop should of apologized for having such a piece of scum on the force and released her without a ticket…. this is y people hate cops and y she flicked him off in the first place… the conversation that cop has with her after they write her the ticket about moving on and not letting the past define her is bullshit…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1730897852 Maxresdefault.jpg Previous post We Tried America’s Best Horsepower Hack (HiLow Special)