Read Time:1 Minute, 52 Second

Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw

Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT

Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit

Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit

Submit your videos here: [email protected]

Sponsorship inquiries: [email protected]

Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.

This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.

Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.

FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.

Original video: https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/2023/09/01/jonathan-guesssford-delaware-state-police-middle-finger-lawsuit-speed-trap-protest-wins-judgment/70743335007/

Delaware Online: https://www.delawareonline.com/

Articles:
https://bit.ly/3rMNqLx
https://bit.ly/46HSwaB

Del. Code tit. 11 § 1301- https://bit.ly/3Qd5eJi

Giboney v. Empire Storage Company- https://bit.ly/3tvD8zI

Elli v. City of Ellisville- https://bit.ly/3fQVYeh

Obriecht v. Splinter- https://bit.ly/3TqsYHY

Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition- https://bit.ly/3GFok4k

Del. Code tit. 11 § 611- https://bit.ly/3tmp0c9

Del. Code tit. 11 § 601- https://bit.ly/46nlVas

Del. Code tit.11 § 811- https://bit.ly/46nlX24

U.S. v. Jacobsen- https://bit.ly/3tqigdi

Johnson v. Campbell- https://bit.ly/3rW7KKa

Texas v. Johnson- https://bit.ly/3CRAe8K

Corey v. Nassan- https://bit.ly/3T7FGfF

Del. Code tit. 21 § 4157- https://bit.ly/3rIXhSu

source

Audit the Audit

About Post Author

Audit the Audit

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

23 thoughts on “CLUELESS Cops Cost Their Citizens $50,000!

  1. Absolutely WILD how the cops debated how to properly fuck over the citizen on their radio.

    They basically planned the best reason to pull him over AFTER having pulled him over.

  2. It's horsehit how often "reasonable" is used in the law, yet they hire cucks who police the law based solely on their emotions with almost zero understanding of what "reasonable" even means.

  3. The fact he had his child there doing that show us how much of a shity parents he really is omfg tell me you are a awful dad without telling me you are a awful dad i mean what would of happen if a distracted drive hit his car speeding like wtf just because you can don't mean you should and was the car of to keep the car cool while his child was alone in the car

  4. + maybe that cop had a perceived reason to confiscate the sign for the collection of evidence. but the destruction of the property shows intent for something other than collecting: so lets fast forward,,, what happened to these criminals?

  5. It’s the attorney of law… But I cannot agree with the auditor having his kid in the car… That became leverage for the officers

Comments are closed.

1720224496 Maxresdefault.jpg Previous post Why Car Companies Lose Money on Purpose
1720279888 Maxresdefault.jpg Next post How Anorexia Tore Apart Identical Twins: A Tragic Tale | Real Stories Full-Length Documentary