Read Time:1 Minute, 56 Second
Second Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
Spotify: https://spoti.fi/439TpHT
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuditTheAudit
Submit your videos here: auditheaudit@gmail.com
Sponsorship inquiries: audit@ellify.com
Welcome to Audit the Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vkJtdLXTZA
Bodycam Files’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/@bodycamfiles
Second channel video on Sovereign Citizen: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uboqoACakXU
Sources:
Fla. Stat. § 322.03 – https://bit.ly/3BxJdg8
Kent v. Dulles – https://bit.ly/3twMPZL
Hendrick v. Maryland- https://bit.ly/2Qac4Tc
Bismarck v. Stuart- https://bit.ly/3DrYkb9
Harvey v. Weld County District Attorney- https://bit.ly/3DoYxfp
18 U.S.C. § 31- https://bit.ly/42JexEm
Fla. Stat. § 322.01- https://bit.ly/3W8eiAi
Rodriguez v. United States- https://bit.ly/2LS1sqc
United States v. Gibbs- https://bit.ly/3MwUlQx
South Dakota v. Opperman- https://bit.ly/3oMhu2k
Colorado v. Bertine- https://bit.ly/3of8JDz
Florida v. Wells- https://bit.ly/3BwhhZT
Florida Highway Patrol Policy 11.04.04 – https://www.flhsmv.gov/pdf/fhp/policies/1104.pdf
Arrest record- https://bit.ly/432rXet
Court records (Cases 2022-TR-000989, 2022-TR-001024)- https://bit.ly/3OgsogX
source
Happy
0 %
Sad
0 %
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
0 %
Surprise
0 %
0
0
21 thoughts on “She THOUGHT She Knew Her Rights!”
Comments are closed.
This commentary and ‘legal break down’ is annoying and unnecessary. Let the body-cam video play please
I would love to see this moron woman stand in front of a judge and argue with him/her……that would be a hoot
Why does this dumb ass think she doesn't need a drivers license to drive a car. ONG WTF!
"Common Law. Natural Law"
yes lady, Common Law was in the 17th Century when you were riding a horse and carriage on behalf of a household or a husband's errand. Back in that time, you had HORSES instead of an engine, and the horses would keep from speeding on the highway and they would avoid running into trees and obstacles. Since you DO NOT run the car with horses you need to provide a license and be sober and cooperative, to prove that you won't f.. kill somebody with the car. This is step 1. BTW I AM THE SUPERVISOR but don't say anything
Regardless of what courts have held, searching a vehicle, including searching inside closed containers in the vehicle, is a gross violation of the 4th Amendment. Obviously that’s just my opinion, not a legal standard.
Regardless of what courts have held, searching a vehicle, including searching inside closed containers in the vehicle, is a gross violation of the 4th Amendment. Obviously that’s just my opinion, not a legal standard.
Hey dummy, you’re TRAVELING by DRIVING.
11:59 Don't do drugs kids, it rots your brain in believing this crap.
She think she's in a Starbucks
You know, it really says a lot how much of the law I learned through YouTube rather then in life
It should be simple by stating, “you can take it up with the Judge.” Period. Done.
If you haven't had the pleasure – ask a Sovereign Citizen explain 'traveling' versus driving. The three 'Citizens' I asked actually talked themselves into a panic attack. When they 'inventoried' her vehicle and found the blow – I wish he had told her that inventorying and searching has the very same distinction as do driving and 'traveling'. Let the tongue-tying begin lololololol
To this day I will never understand the thought process of “ go get your supervisor” it has never worked and the amount of entitlement one has to have to demand the sergeant stop what he’s doing to come to a random road where their traffic stop is taking place to save the day “guys you can’t cop that way, it’s bad!”
Of course you're free to travel. By foot.
R people actually this delutional?
Soon as she said i dont have to have a drivers license to drive a car i knew there was cocaine i that vehicle. Lol
The officer clearly does not understand that this traveller actually studied law at Reddit university …
Perfect’y splendid example of southern, christian, republican, donald tramp worshiping PWT!
Can part of these moron's sentence be to have to watch this or something like it on a loop for a day or until it sinks in? Shesh.
Very nice upload with great information.
Shut up and run the damn video!!!!!!!
This is stupid. 99 percent of us understand the law without your bullshit. You ruin something weird